On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:39:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 11:56:46AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:57:02PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:22:28PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:50:40AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > > > The OpenFlow specification implies that every flag is part of the flow
> > > > > state, even though that isn't really meaningful for 
> > > > > OFPFF_CHECK_OVERLAP
> > > > > or OFPFF_RESET_COUNTS.  This commit adds them to the flow state 
> > > > > (reported
> > > > > in flow stats replies).
> > > > > 
> > > > > Found by OFTest.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Well that is the silliest thing I have seen all day.
> > > > Do you know of any plan to resolve this in future Open Flow versions?
> > > > 
> > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com>
> > > 
> > > Oops, I spoke slightly to soon.
> > > 
> > > I think the test you add is slightly misleading as it seems to me
> > > that flags have been exposed since OF1.3 rather than OF1.4.
> > > 
> > > The following incremental change to that test, though verbose,
> > > illustrates that.
> > 
> > Simon, thank you.
> > 
> > I feel like this makes you a co-author, are you willing to give me a
> > Signed-off-by for it?
> 
> Sure, here it is:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com>

Thanks!

I applied this to master.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to