On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:39:24AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 11:56:46AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:57:02PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 04:22:28PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:50:40AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > > > The OpenFlow specification implies that every flag is part of the flow > > > > > state, even though that isn't really meaningful for > > > > > OFPFF_CHECK_OVERLAP > > > > > or OFPFF_RESET_COUNTS. This commit adds them to the flow state > > > > > (reported > > > > > in flow stats replies). > > > > > > > > > > Found by OFTest. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> > > > > > > > > Well that is the silliest thing I have seen all day. > > > > Do you know of any plan to resolve this in future Open Flow versions? > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com> > > > > > > Oops, I spoke slightly to soon. > > > > > > I think the test you add is slightly misleading as it seems to me > > > that flags have been exposed since OF1.3 rather than OF1.4. > > > > > > The following incremental change to that test, though verbose, > > > illustrates that. > > > > Simon, thank you. > > > > I feel like this makes you a co-author, are you willing to give me a > > Signed-off-by for it? > > Sure, here it is: > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com>
Thanks! I applied this to master. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev