On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 08:29:32AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:57:04AM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:03:13PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 03:29:04PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo > > > wrote: > > > > Use IPv4-mapped addresses and use either tnl_arp_lookup or > > > > tnl_nd_lookup. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <casca...@redhat.com> > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > @@ -5348,8 +5349,13 @@ xlate_push_stats(struct xlate_cache *xcache, > > > > break; > > > > case XC_TNL_ARP: > > > > /* Lookup arp to avoid arp timeout. */ > > > > - tnl_arp_lookup(entry->u.tnl_arp_cache.br_name, > > > > - entry->u.tnl_arp_cache.d_ip, &dmac); > > > > + d_ip = > > > > in6_addr_get_mapped_ipv4(&entry->u.tnl_arp_cache.d_ipv6); > > > > + if (d_ip) { > > > > + tnl_arp_lookup(entry->u.tnl_arp_cache.br_name, d_ip, > > > > &dmac); > > > > + } else { > > > > + tnl_nd_lookup(entry->u.tnl_arp_cache.br_name, > > > > + &entry->u.tnl_arp_cache.d_ipv6, &dmac); > > > > + } > > > > > > This code seems a little silly to me, because it is going to some > > > trouble to distinguish IPv4 from IPv6 and pick the correct > > > tnl_*_lookup() function, and either function it picks is going to > > > convert that right back to do the lookup. I think it would be more > > > sensible to export tnl_arp_lookup__() so that the double conversion > > > isn't needed. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Ben. > > > > Urgh. Well, I could just use tnl_nd_lookup here with an extra comment > > about that. Exporting tnl_arp_lookup__ would require exporting struct > > tnl_arp_entry. But I see your point. The only bad point for me in > > using tnl_nd_lookup directly would be the naming. But since we already > > have an IPv6 address in our hands, why not just add a comment assuring > > this will work on IPv4-mapped addresses as well? > > If the naming is an issue, you could invent a more generic name, > e.g. "tnl_lookup_mac_to_ip_binding". But I don't think it's a big deal.
maybe tnl_neigh_lookup() ? fbl _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev