On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 03:29:02PM -0200, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote: > From: Jiri Benc <jbenc-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+a...@public.gmane.org> > > Note that because there's been no prerequisite on the outer protocol, > we cannot add it now. Instead, treat the ipv4 and ipv6 dst fields in the way > that either both are null, or at most one of them is non-null. > > [cascardo: abstract testing either dst with flow_tnl_dst_is_set] > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jb...@redhat.com> > Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <casca...@redhat.com> > Co-authored-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <casca...@redhat.com>
One wonders whether it would be worth merging the ip_dst and ipv6_dst fields in struct flow_tnl, using IPv6-mapped IPv4 addresses for the IPv4 case. Did you consider that? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
