It can work if we can define "where" to be an array of <condition> and boolean values. For example: "where" : [false, <condition>*]. Since the monitor_cond will monitor any row that match at least one of the conditions, if we will have "where" : [false] no row will be monitored.
This solution looks good to me. May be we can define <condition> as either a 3-element array, or a JSON boolean. For completeness, we can define where : [] to be the same as where : [true] However it seems little awkward to me. Maybe we should define a new member called "conditional" : boolean that will indicate if we need to refer to conditions. I'd prefer the last solution. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
