On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 12:17:04AM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote: > > > On Oct 18, 2015, at 12:52 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > > The original concept for "expr" and "actions" was that they should not need > > to know anything about the mapping between physical and logical fields, > > that instead everything should be provided via the symbol table. In > > practice this has proven difficult because a couple of actions need to know > > about logical fields. For now, it seems reasonable to put the logical > > field mapping into a header of its own. Later, maybe we'll figure out > > whether there's value in a less leaky abstraction. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> > > Thanks for doing this. I looked at the changes since the last > version, and they look good to me. I think you have ACKs on > everything then. > > Acked-by: Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com>
Thanks, I applied this series to master. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
