On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> wrote: >> diff --git a/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/net.h >> b/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/net.h >> index 9c94745..2a6903d 100644 >> --- a/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/net.h >> +++ b/datapath/linux/compat/include/linux/net.h > [...] >> +#ifndef HAVE_SOCK_CREATE_KERN_NET >> +int ovs_sock_create_kern(struct net *net, int family, int type, int >> protocol, struct socket **res); >> +void ovs_sock_release(struct socket *sock); >> +#define sock_create_kern ovs_sock_create_kern >> +#define sock_release ovs_sock_release >> +#endif > > Is there a reason why this is ovs_sock_create_kern() instead of using > rpl_ like in other places? And do we even need sock_release() all now?
sock_release macro required for backport. I used ovs_ prefix since there is already sock_release() defined on older kernel which is pretty different from the one backported. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
