On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Nithin Raju <nit...@vmware.com> wrote: > >> On Sep 22, 2015, at 9:07 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks Sairam and Nithin, I applied this to master. > > Ben, > Can you pls. apply this to 2.4 as well?
I'm somewhat concerned about the number and size of Windows patches that are targeted at 2.4 (it seems a lot went out today in particular). Besides being large, many of them don't seem to meet the criteria that I would normally expect for a backport. For example, some look like features (64 bit support, TCP flags) while others appear to be fixes for bugs so fundamental to the operation of things that it seems unlikely that that part of the code can be deployed as it currently exists (checksums in STT, VXLAN). Can you please explain the rationale? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
