On 09/17/2015 01:11 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > This is a proposed plan for logical L3 in OVN. It is not entirely > complete but it includes many important details and I believe that it moves > planning forward. > > Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> > --- > ovn/TODO | 264 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > ovn/northd/ovn-northd.8.xml | 342 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > ovn/ovn-architecture.7.xml | 2 +- > ovn/ovn-sb.xml | 109 ++++++++++++-- > 4 files changed, 697 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/ovn/TODO b/ovn/TODO > index 6f625ce..a0f5385 100644 > --- a/ovn/TODO > +++ b/ovn/TODO > @@ -1,3 +1,265 @@ > +-*- outline -*- > + > +* L3 support > + > +** OVN_Northbound schema > + > +*** Needs to support interconnected routers > + > +It should be possible to connect one router to another, e.g. to > +represent a provider/tenant router relationship. This requires > +an OVN_Northbound schema change.
I'm curious about the use case here. I'd like to be able to put a router between a Neutron "provider network" (existing physical network) and a regular tenant network (OVN managed virtual network). Is that the kind of thing you're talking about? Here's how I'd model that example with 2 tenants with 3 VMs each on their own tenant networks (I think). I was thinking it could be a special Logical Switch to hook a localnet port to a logical router, similar to what we do with regular vif logical ports. Logical Switch LS1 (for tenant A) Logical Port LP1 Logical Port LP2 Logical Port LP3 router = LR1 Logical Switch LS2 (for tenant A) Logical Port LP4, type=localnet. network-name=mynetwork router = LR1 Logical Router LR1 (for tenant A) Logical Router Port LRP1, network=LS1 Logical Router Port LRP2, network=LS2 Logical Switch LS3 (for tenant B) Logical Port LP5 Logical Port LP6 Logical Port LP7 router = LR2 Logical Switch LS4 (for tenant B) Logical Port LP8, type=localnet, network-name=mynetwork router = LR2 Logical Router LR2 (for tenant B) Logical Router Port LRP3, network=LS3 Logical Router Port LRP4, network=LS4 Does that sort of configuration seem sane? If not, how would we accomplish the end goal? -- Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
