> On Aug 25, 2015, at 1:03 PM, Bruce Davie <bda...@nicira.com> wrote:
> 
> diff --git a/vtep/vtep.xml b/vtep/vtep.xml
> index ff8d0fe..a554dcf 100644
> --- a/vtep/vtep.xml
> +++ b/vtep/vtep.xml
> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@
>       <group title="BFD Local Configuration">
>         <p>
>           The HSC writes the key-value pairs in the
> -          <ref column="bfd_config_local"/> column to specifiy the local
> +          <ref column="bfd_config_local"/> column to specify the local

There are a few typo fixes in this patch.  Normally, with a big change like 
this patch, I wouldn't roll those in.  The main reason is that if the patch 
gets reverted at some point, these fixes would be lost, too.  It's probably not 
worth re-spinning this patch, but thought I'd mention it.

> +    <column name="acl_bindings">
> +      <p>
> +        Attach Access Control Lists (ACLs) to the physical port. The
> +        column consists of a map of VLAN tags to <ref table="ACL"/>s. If the 
> value of
> +        the VLAN tag in the map is 0, this means that the ACL is
> +        associated with the entire physical port. Non-zero values mean
> +        that the ACL is to be applied only on packets carrying that VLAN
> +        tag value. Switches will not necessarily support matching on the
> +        VLAN tag for all ACLs, and unsupported ACL bindings will cause
> +        errors to be reported.
> +      </p>

This isn't related to this patch, but I didn't see what happens when 
"vlan_bindings" or "vlan_stats" uses a key of 0.

> @@ -851,6 +870,15 @@
>       One or more static routes, mapping IP prefixes to next hop IP addresses.
>     </column>
> 
> +    <column name="acl_binding">
> +      Maps ACLs to logical router interfaces. The router interfaces
> +      are indicated using IP address notation, and must be the same
> +      interfaces created in the <ref column="switch_binding"/>
> +      column. For example, an ACL could be associated with the logical
> +      router interface with an address of 192.68.1.1 as defined in the
> +      example above.
> +    </column>

The Physical_Port table has an "invalid_ACL_binding" error.  Do you think it's 
worth adding one to the Logical_Router table, too?

> +  <table name="ACL_entry">
> +    <p>
> +      Describes the individual entries that comprise an Access Control List.
> +    </p>
> +    <p>
> +      Each entry in the table is a single rule to match on certain
> +      header fields. While there are a large number of fields that can
> +      be matched on, most hardware cannot match on arbitrary
> +      combinations of fields. It is common to match on either L2
> +      fields (described below in the L2 group of columns) or L3/L4 fields
> +      (the L3/L4 group of columns) but not both. The hardware switch
> +      controller may log an error if an ACL entry requires it to match
> +      on an incompatible mixture of fields.

Do you think it's worth mentioning that all packets are allowed by default?

> +    <column name="sequence">
> +      <p>
> +        The sequence number for the ACL entry for the purpose of
> +        ordering entries in an ACL.

I think it would be helpful to indicate whether a larger number is more likely 
to hit or less likely.

> +      </column>
> +            <column name="ethertype">
> +        <p>
> +          Ethertype in hexadecimal, in the form
> +          <var>0xAAA</var> 

This is very minor, but I think it may be clearer with a fourth "A".

> +      <column name="source_port_min">
> +        <p>
> +          Lower end of the range of source port values.
> +        </p>
> +      </column>
> +      <column name="source_port_max">
> +        <p>
> +          Upper end of the range of source port values.
> +        </p>
> +      </column>
> +      <column name="dest_port_min">
> +        <p>
> +          Lower end of the range of destination port values.
> +        </p>
> +      </column>
> +      <column name="dest_port_max">
> +        <p>
> +          Upper end of the range of destination port values.
> +        </p>

For all of these, it would be good to indicate if the chosen value is included. 
 (I assume it is.)

> +      <column name="tcp_flags">
> +        <p>
> +          Integer representing the value of TCP flags to match.
> +        </p>
> +      </column>
> +      <column name="tcp_flags_mask">
> +        <p>
> +          Integer representing the mask to apply when matching TCP flags.
> +        </p>

It might be nice to include an example for "tcp_flags" and its mask.

Otherwise, it looks good.

Thanks,

--Justin


_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to