On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com> wrote: > On 30 July 2015 at 12:24, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com> >> wrote: >>> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml >>> index 70cc14b..f3236db 100644 >>> --- a/.travis.yml >>> +++ b/.travis.yml >>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ env: >>> - TESTSUITE=1 KERNEL=3.18.1 >>> - TESTSUITE=1 OPTS="--enable-shared" >>> - BUILD_ENV="-m32" OPTS="--disable-ssl" >>> + - KERNEL=4.1.3 >>> - KERNEL=4.0.2 >> >> I wonder if we should just replace 4.0.2? I don't know if we need to >> check every kernel version and it will increase build times. > > Sure, this was on my mind too. Do we have some heuristic to figure out > which kernels to test? > > The ones that make the most sense to me would be LTS or those included > in major releases of popular distros. Perhaps the existing selection > of versions is more intentional than I can see, but it looks like a > random scattering to me.
I don't think there is much in the way of a pattern at this point. I agree with your logic - earliest and latest kernels that we support, common distribution kernels or LTS releases, anywhere where we know there was a major change, etc. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
