On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 05:32:06PM -0700, Romain Lenglet wrote: > > On June 18, 2015 at 2:39:31 PM, Shashank Shanbhag > (shashank.shanb...@gmail.com(mailto:shashank.shanb...@gmail.com)) wrote: > > > Hi Ben, > > > > Please review when you get a chance. We would really like this to be in the > > 2.4 release. :-) > > > > This patch has the following changes suggested by you in the last review: > > 1. ovs-ofctl replace-flow and diff-flow queries the switch for visible > > tables > > > > You also suggested that we move to using an array rather than a hash. > > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-June/055998.html > > > > An array of 255 pointers to classifiers would lead to 2040 bytes (64-bit > > system). I'd like to avoid that especially when there are a handful of > > tables. > > I believe you meant something like 2MB here?
Seriously, you guys can't figure out how to use an array of 8-bit integers instead of a linked list of 8-bit integers? WTF? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
