Good to see these done!~

Acked-by: Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com>

On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> ---
>  ovn/TODO | 85
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 85 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ovn/TODO b/ovn/TODO
> index fe296b4..07d66da 100644
> --- a/ovn/TODO
> +++ b/ovn/TODO
> @@ -1,64 +1,5 @@
>  * ovn-controller
>
> -** Flow table handling in ovn-controller.
> -
> -   ovn-controller has to transform logical datapath flows from the
> -   database into OpenFlow flows.
> -
> -*** Definition (or choice) of data structure for flows and flow table.
> -
> -    It would be natural enough to use "struct flow" and "struct
> -    classifier" for this.  Maybe that is what we should do.  However,
> -    "struct classifier" is optimized for searches based on packet
> -    headers, whereas all we care about here can be implemented with a
> -    hash table.  Also, we may want to make it easy to add and remove
> -    support for fields without recompiling, which is not possible with
> -    "struct flow" or "struct classifier".
> -
> -    On the other hand, we may find that it is difficult to decide that
> -    two OXM flow matches are identical (to normalize them) without a
> -    lot of domain-specific knowledge that is already embedded in struct
> -    flow.  It's also going to be a pain to come up with a way to make
> -    anything other than "struct flow" work with the ofputil_*()
> -    functions for encoding and decoding OpenFlow.
> -
> -    It's also possible we could use struct flow without struct
> -    classifier.
> -
> -*** Translating logical datapath actions into OpenFlow actions.
> -
> -    Some of the logical datapath actions do not have natural
> -    representations as OpenFlow actions: they require
> -    packet-in/packet-out round trips through ovn-controller.  The
> -    trickiest part of that is going to be making sure that the
> -    packet-out resumes the control flow that was broken off by the
> -    packet-in.  That's tricky; we'll probably have to restrict control
> -    flow or add OVS features to make resuming in general possible.  Not
> -    sure which is better at this point.
> -
> -*** OpenFlow flow table synchronization.
> -
> -    The internal representation of the OpenFlow flow table has to be
> -    synced across the controller connection to OVS.  This probably
> -    boils down to the "flow monitoring" feature of OF1.4 which was then
> -    made available as a "standard extension" to OF1.3.  (OVS hasn't
> -    implemented this for OF1.4 yet, but the feature is based on a OVS
> -    extension to OF1.0, so it should be straightforward to add it.)
> -
> -    We probably need some way to catch cases where OVS and OVN don't
> -    see eye-to-eye on what exactly constitutes a flow, so that OVN
> -    doesn't waste a lot of CPU time hammering at OVS trying to install
> -    something that it's not going to do.
> -
> -*** Logical/physical translation.
> -
> -    When a packet comes into the integration bridge, the first stage of
> -    processing needs to translate it from a physical to a logical
> -    context.  When a packet leaves the integration bridge, the final
> -    stage of processing needs to translate it back into a physical
> -    context.  ovn-controller needs to populate the OpenFlow flows
> -    tables to do these translations.
> -
>  *** Determine how to split logical pipeline across physical nodes.
>
>      From the original OVN architecture document:
> @@ -78,8 +19,6 @@
>      The split pipeline processing split will influence how tunnel keys
>      are encoded.
>
> -*** Monitor Pipeline table in OVN, trigger flow table recomputation on
> change.
> -
>  ** ovn-controller parameters and configuration.
>
>  *** SSL configuration.
> @@ -94,13 +33,6 @@
>
>    Andy Zhou is looking at these issues.
>
> -** Scaling number of connections.
> -
> -   In typical use today a given ovsdb-server has only a single-digit
> -   number of simultaneous connections.  The OVN Southbound database will
> -   have a connection from every hypervisor.  This use case needs testing
> -   and probably coding work.  Here are some possible improvements.
> -
>  *** Reducing amount of data sent to clients.
>
>      Currently, whenever a row monitored by a client changes,
> @@ -161,20 +93,3 @@
>     Epstein et al., "What's the Difference? Efficient Set
>     Reconciliation Without Prior Context".  (I'm not yet aware of
>     previous non-academic use of this technique.)
> -
> -* Miscellaneous:
> -
> -** Init scripts for ovn-controller (on HVs), ovn-northd, OVN DB server.
> -
> -** Distribution packaging.
> -
> -* Not yet scoped:
> -
> -** Neutron plugin.
> -
> -   This is being developed on OpenStack's development infrastructure
> -   to be along side most of the other Neutron plugins.
> -
> -   http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/networking-ovn
> -
> -** Gateways.
> --
> 2.1.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev@openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to