On 9 June 2015 at 13:29, Joe Stringer <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9 June 2015 at 12:33, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:41:04AM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: >>> On 7 June 2015 at 11:03, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 06:22:19PM -0700, Joe Stringer wrote: >>> >> Unique flow identifiers are really a UUID of sorts, so it makes sense to >>> >> reuse the UUID string representations for UFID. >>> >> >>> >> Suggested-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> >>> >> Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <[email protected]> >>> > >>> > Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> >>> >>> It strikes me that it may be somewhat misleading to print UFIDs as >>> UUIDs, given that there are specific bits with particular meaning in >>> the UUID standards. One way to resolve this would be to tweak the UFID >>> generation to create variant 4 UUIDs ("random") by overwriting the >>> appropriate bits after hashing. >> >> The same did occur to me. It's probably a good idea, if you're up for >> it. > > Sure. It should be a minor patch on top of this.
I applied this series to master, thanks. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
