On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 05:35:14PM -0700, Alex Wang wrote: > > I'm not fully comfortable with assert-failing (killing ovs-vswitchd) if > > the flow table has unsupported features in it. Also, even when HSA > > doesn't kill the process due to assert-failing, it could still delay the > > process by an arbitrary amount of time. Do you have an idea for a way > > to keep curious admins from accidentally taking down their switch by > > running an HSA command ("hey, what does this ovs-appctl command do?")? > > Sure, the asserts are more for alerting things at development time. > Will change to VLOG.
Great. > Also, I can only think of separating the logic info a thread to prevent > it from blocking the main thread? I don't know whether that is practical. Is it? If not, then let's not worry about it for now. If it becomes a problem, we'll come up with something. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev