How about this?
diff --git a/lib/match.c b/lib/match.c
index 7d0b409..e34572d 100644
--- a/lib/match.c
+++ b/lib/match.c
@@ -360,6 +360,10 @@ match_set_dl_tci(struct match *match, ovs_be16 tci)
void
match_set_dl_tci_masked(struct match *match, ovs_be16 tci, ovs_be16 mask)
{
+ if (mask && mask != htons(0xffff)) {
+ tci |= htons(VLAN_CFI);
+ mask |= htons(VLAN_CFI);
+ }
match->flow.vlan_tci = tci & mask;
match->wc.masks.vlan_tci = mask;
}
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com> wrote:
> Thx for the reference, exactly what i want,
>
> Will change the solution~
>
> Thanks,
> Alex Wang,
>
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:21:50PM -0700, Alex Wang wrote:
>> > OVS datapath has check which prevents the installation of flow
>> > that matches VLAN TCI but does not have exact match for VLAN_CFI
>> > bit. However, the ovs userspace does not enforce it, so OpenFlow
>> > flow like "vlan_tci=0x000a/0x0fff,action=output:local" can be added
>> > to ovs. Subsequently, the generated megaflow will have match
>> > field for vlan like "vlan(vid=5/0xfff,pcp=0/0x0,cfi=1/0)".
>> >
>> > With the OVS datapath check, the installation of such megaflow
>> > will be rejected with:
>> > "|WARN|system@ovs-system: failed to put[create][modify] (Invalid
>> argument)"
>> >
>> > This commit adds a check in userspace that mark the vlan mask
>> > invalid if it does not exact match for VLAN_CFI. So users will
>> > be asked to provide correct mask.
>>
>> This is not the right fix, because it is legitimate and useful not to
>> match on the "CFI" (actually "vlan present") bit in OpenFlow. See the
>> comment in meta-flow.h:
>>
>> /* "vlan_tci".
>> *
>> * 802.1Q TCI.
>> *
>> * For a packet with an 802.1Q header, this is the Tag Control
>> Information
>> * (TCI) field, with the CFI bit forced to 1. For a packet with no
>> 802.1Q
>> * header, this has value 0.
>> *
>> * This field can be used in various ways:
>> *
>> * - If it is not constrained at all, the nx_match matches packets
>> * without an 802.1Q header or with an 802.1Q header that has any
>> TCI
>> * value.
>> *
>> * - Testing for an exact match with 0 matches only packets without
>> an
>> * 802.1Q header.
>> *
>> * - Testing for an exact match with a TCI value with CFI=1 matches
>> * packets that have an 802.1Q header with a specified VID and
>> PCP.
>> *
>> * - Testing for an exact match with a nonzero TCI value with CFI=0
>> does
>> * not make sense. The switch may reject this combination.
>> *
>> * - Testing with a specific VID and CFI=1, with nxm_mask=0x1fff,
>> matches
>> * packets that have an 802.1Q header with that VID (and any PCP).
>> *
>> * - Testing with a specific PCP and CFI=1, with nxm_mask=0xf000,
>> matches
>> * packets that have an 802.1Q header with that PCP (and any VID).
>> *
>> * - Testing with nxm_value=0, nxm_mask=0x0fff matches packets with
>> no
>> * 802.1Q header or with an 802.1Q header with a VID of 0.
>> *
>> * - Testing with nxm_value=0, nxm_mask=0xe000 matches packets with
>> no
>> * 802.1Q header or with an 802.1Q header with a PCP of 0.
>> *
>> * - Testing with nxm_value=0, nxm_mask=0xefff matches packets with
>> no
>> * 802.1Q header or with an 802.1Q header with both VID and PCP
>> of 0.
>> *
>> * Type: be16.
>> * Maskable: bitwise.
>> * Formatting: hexadecimal.
>> * Prerequisites: none.
>> * Access: read/write.
>> * NXM: NXM_OF_VLAN_TCI(4) since v1.1.
>> * OXM: none.
>> * OF1.0: exact match.
>> * OF1.1: exact match.
>> */
>> MFF_VLAN_TCI,
>>
>> I think that we should fix this in flow translation, by "unwildcarding"
>> the CFI bit if any other bits in vlan_tci are unwildcarded.
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
