For the problem in hand, I sent out I think is a fix yesterday. https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openvswitch.org/msg46000.html
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 05/13/2015 01:28 PM, Gurucharan Shetty wrote: >> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 05/13/2015 11:57 AM, Justin Pettit wrote: >>>> >>>>> On May 13, 2015, at 6:48 AM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> There's some documentation for testing it with DevStack here: >>>>> >>>>> http://networking-ovn.readthedocs.org/en/latest/testing.html >>>>> >>>>> I also have a bunch of patches up for review to make multi-node devstack >>>>> work with OVN. It's currently blocked by an OVN bug, though. I'm sure >>>>> we'll have it sorted out this week, though. That page will include the >>>>> multi-node test instructions once it's all merged. >>>> >>>> Hi, Russell. Have you sent out anything about this OVN bug? Ben and >>>> I have been traveling the last couple of weeks, so I just want to >>>> make sure that we didn't miss something. Let me know if there's >>>> anything we can do. >>> >>> Not yet. I had been working on my multi-node setup and just this week >>> got far enough where I think it should be working. I'm having trouble >>> talking between hypervisors, though. At the end of the day yesterday, >>> Gurucharan Shetty said that he now has the same problem with the latest >>> code in the ovn branch. I was hoping to better understand what was >>> going on today so that I could either come up with a patch or a more >>> intelligent bug report. :-) >>> >> >> The problem at the looks of it is that when you have more than one VM >> in each hypervisor, the broadcast flow generated in table17 by >> ovn-controller misses broadcasting to one VM (if you just have one VM >> each, you can ping). The pipeline table in OVN_SB looks to have the >> correct entry (unless I am misreading it), but it does not get >> converted into openflow flows by ovn-controller properly. > > Thanks for clarifying. I was actually getting confused just now since > it seemed to be working with just 1 VM on each hypervisor while trying > to replicate it. :-) > > -- > Russell Bryant _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
