Guru, No, nothing changed. Just added acked. After I sent the mail I saw that the patch was already pushed. Please ignore this version.
Thanks, Sorin -----Original Message----- From: Gurucharan Shetty [mailto:shet...@nicira.com] Sent: Wednesday, 29 April, 2015 17:28 To: Sorin Vinturis Cc: dev@openvswitch.org Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] datapath-windows: Removed duplicate instance pid removal On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:49 PM, Sorin Vinturis <svintu...@cloudbasesolutions.com> wrote: > Instance PID is already deleted in the OvsCleanupPacketQueue function. > > Signed-off-by: Sorin Vinturis <svintu...@cloudbasesolutions.com> > Acked-by: Nithin Raju <nit...@vmware.com> This patch had already been applied. Did anything change? > --- > v2: Rebased the patch. > > v3: Added ack. > --- > datapath-windows/ovsext/User.c | 6 ------ > 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/datapath-windows/ovsext/User.c > b/datapath-windows/ovsext/User.c index 03f0377..76a9ed1 100644 > --- a/datapath-windows/ovsext/User.c > +++ b/datapath-windows/ovsext/User.c > @@ -163,12 +163,6 @@ OvsSubscribeDpIoctl(PVOID instanceP, > if (instance->packetQueue && !join) { > /* unsubscribe */ > OvsCleanupPacketQueue(instance); > - > - OvsAcquirePidHashLock(); > - /* Remove the instance from pidHashArray */ > - OvsDelPidInstance(gOvsSwitchContext, pid); > - OvsReleasePidHashLock(); > - > } else if (instance->packetQueue == NULL && join) { > queue = (POVS_USER_PACKET_QUEUE) OvsAllocateMemoryWithTag( > sizeof *queue, OVS_USER_POOL_TAG); > -- > 1.9.0.msysgit.0 > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev