On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:14:46PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> The integration bridge will be needed by other components soon, so make
> it part of the general ovn-controller context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit <jpet...@nicira.com>
This solves a problem I had too, and I like your solution better.
Thanks.
It seems a little harsh to have the daemon die if the integration bridge
disappears. I would expect the daemon to wait for it to reappear. If
that's difficult now, that's fine with me, if you agree that it's not
the desirable long-term behavior (and add a comment?).
This change isn't really necessary, since the compiler will initialize
everything in the struct to null or zero. There are already several
members that we don't initialize explicitly, I assumed that
.chassis_name was just there to suppress compiler warnings:
@@ -111,11 +141,11 @@ try_again:
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct unixctl_server *unixctl;
- struct controller_ctx ctx = { .chassis_name = NULL };
+ struct controller_ctx ctx = { .chassis_name = NULL, .br_int_name =
NULL };
bool exiting;
int retval;
ovs_cmdl_proctitle_init(argc, argv);
set_program_name(argv[0]);
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
