On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:15:02PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
> > On Apr 21, 2015, at 7:44 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:20:33PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't see how this works, since lexer_get() is not initially called.
> >
> > I'm getting the impression you're less comfortable than me with
> > partially implementing a vague specification. I sent a fix:
> > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-April/054441.html
>
> Well, I guess I do have a preference that they either work as
> specified or we note somewhere things that we know won't work. I'd be
> just as happy if we put in the TODO list things that we know we need
> to come back to. I just find review time a good opportunity to catch
> things, because it's really the only time we're scouring the code.
> Later on, a lot of these issues may show up as bugs or slow down
> development as someone has to rediscover that there's missing features
> that they were expecting to work.
Fair enough.
> Speaking of, this patch series ticked off at least a couple of items
> from the TODO list, which can now be removed. It's great to see it
> getting whittled down.
There's quite a bit we can remove I think:
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-April/054469.html
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
