On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 05:21:08PM +0100, Daniele Di Proietto wrote: > Minor issue: the compilers I’ve tried (GCC 4.9, 4.8 clang 3.5 and sparse > 0.4.5) do not report a warning if I try to access atomic variables without > atomic function. Maybe someone can confirm this?
Yeah, those versions of GCC and Clang actually turn atomic variable access without use of atomic functions into implicit seq_cst accesses, and sparse is so limited that we just implement atomics as bare variables for it. It's not ideal. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
