On Mon, 2 Mar 2015, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > So it would be IMHO better for longer-term maintainability to have the > relevant __GFP_THISNODE callers pass also __GFP_NO_KSWAPD to denote these > opportunistic allocation attempts, instead of having this subtle semantic
You are thinking about an opportunistic allocation attempt in SLAB? AFAICT SLAB allocations should trigger reclaim. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
