On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 03:18:38PM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 02/20/2015 02:14 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:55:49PM -0500, Russell Bryant wrote: > >> On 02/20/2015 01:42 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > >>> strncpy() has a lot of pitfalls. A while back we replaced all its uses by > >>> calls to ovs_strlcpy() or ovs_strzcpy(), but some more have crept in. > >>> This > >>> commit fixes them. > >>> > >> > >> Great, I like this a lot more than what I did. > >> > >> > >>> @@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ ovs_router_insert__(uint8_t priority, ovs_be32 > >>> ip_dst, uint8_t plen, > >>> rt_init_match(&match, ip_dst, plen); > >>> > >>> p = xzalloc(sizeof *p); > >>> - strncpy(p->output_bridge, output_bridge, IFNAMSIZ); > >>> + ovs_strlcpy(p->output_bridge, output_bridge, IFNAMSIZ); > >>> p->gw = gw; > >>> p->nw_addr = match.flow.nw_dst; > >>> p->plen = plen; > >> > >> Just a nit ... I generally prefer "sizeof p->output_bridge", even though > >> IFNAMSIZ is the same thing. It seems like a less error prone pattern to > >> default to since it's still correct if the destination size were to be > >> changed. I suppose you could argue it could result in accidental cases > >> of getting the size of a pointer instead of the type, but at least > >> coverity catches that. Anyway, I changed several in passing in my > >> changes. I'm still +1 on your patch without it, though. > > > > I thought about this issue too but I was concentrating on not changing > > more than necessary. I'll post a v2. > > Or I can follow-up later with those changes if you're OK with them. > Whichever. Thanks!
It only took a minute so it's already out: http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-February/051475.html _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev