On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:52:51PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 02/19/15 at 02:36pm, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > I thought about this a bit when I was working on the OVN database > > schema, but I didn't bother to write it up. Here's an incremental > > diff against the OVN schema. The first hunk is for the Chassis table, > > the second for the Bindings table. The Pipeline table doesn't need > > special handling because ovs-nbd is fully in charge of it: > > Looks great. Eventually this cleanup process could also take care > of removing stale OVSDB ports after a reboot.
I tend to prefer the model where OVSDB is reconstructed essentially from an empty DB at boot. That's what happens on e.g. XenServer. Is the more long-term model used widely? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
