On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 09:55:57PM -0800, Andy Zhou wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Ben Pfaff <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 06:08:29PM -0800, Andy Zhou wrote:
> >> It is some times useful to leverage the sandbox facility to experiment
> >> and explore the internals of ovs-vswitchd. Since GDB requires console
> >> access for user inputs, this patch launch an xterm for GDB, The main
> >> terminal continue to run the sub-shell as before. Exiting the sub-shell
> >> will also kill the ovs-vswitchd under GDB (but not GDB itself currently)
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andy Zhou <[email protected]>
[...]
> > Do you often run ovs-sandbox without "make"? I haven't tried it that
> > way.
>
> Should we remove the '-g' option?
I think "-g" is fine. I was just curious to find out whether you and I
use the sandbox feature differently.
> On a slightly different note, I may end up move ovs-sandbox out of
> tutorial directory, in case
> we have another use for it, such as "ovsdb micro benchmark", but it is
> premature to discuss at
> this time.
>
> To directly answer your question, I don't use it directly currently.
> I added the option since the
> tutorial talked about run ovs-sandbox with installed OVS programs. On
> the other hand, the -g option
> probably only make sense with the 'make' option.
You could combine the two methods via:
diff --git a/tutorial/automake.mk b/tutorial/automake.mk
index 3d22d7a..5af0aac 100644
--- a/tutorial/automake.mk
+++ b/tutorial/automake.mk
@@ -9,4 +9,4 @@ EXTRA_DIST += \
tutorial/t-stage4
sandbox: all
- cd $(srcdir)/tutorial && MAKE=$(MAKE) ./ovs-sandbox -b
$(abs_builddir)
+ cd $(srcdir)/tutorial && MAKE=$(MAKE) ./ovs-sandbox -b
$(abs_builddir) $(SANDBOXFLAGS)
and then documenting "make sandbox SANDBOXFLAGS=-g" as the way to invoke
the feature. That's fairly clean, maybe that's the way to go?
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
