Thx everyone for the help and review, I apply the patch with following comment:
diff --git a/lib/netdev-dpdk.h b/lib/netdev-dpdk.h index 9a47165..694899c 100644 --- a/lib/netdev-dpdk.h +++ b/lib/netdev-dpdk.h @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ struct dpif_packet; +/* Reserves cpu core 0 for all non-pmd threads. Changing the value of this + * macro will allow pmd thread to be pinned on cpu core 0. This may not be + * ideal since the core may be non-isolated. */ #define NON_PMD_CORE_ID 0 On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:07 PM, Pravin Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com> wrote: > > Pravin, > > > > Based on my test and Kevin's confirmation, I think it is safe to apply > this > > patch for now. What do you think? > > > > If you already have done test with CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG then I > am ok with the patch. > > Acked-by: Pravin B Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
