On 02/03/15 at 05:55pm, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Jesse Gross <je...@nicira.com> wrote: > > It seems like in general userspace should not allow different > > extensions to share the same datapath port. This perhaps isn't much of > > an issue right now but if you enable an extension on one VXLAN port > > (on the userspace side) and have another that is vanilla then we > > shouldn't silently use the extension for everything. > > One other thought on this: > > Is it really right for the kernel to ignore unknown extensions? It > seems like if the user has requested a particular mode and it just > silently doesn't take effect because the kernel doesn't know about it > that's not really great.
Agreed to both statements. Are you OK if I fix this in the upstream kernel first and then backport the changes and in the meantime push these changes after addressing Pravin's feedback? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
