On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:26 AM, Thomas Graf <tg...@suug.ch> wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
> index 4d52aa9..b148739 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
> @@ -568,7 +569,8 @@ static struct sk_buff **vxlan_gro_receive(struct sk_buff
> **head, struct sk_buff
> continue;
>
> vh2 = (struct vxlanhdr *)(p->data + off_vx);
> - if (vh->vx_vni != vh2->vx_vni) {
> + if (vh->vx_flags != vh2->vx_flags ||
> + vh->vx_vni != vh2->vx_vni) {
It's probably better to do a memcmp over the entire header. There's no
guarantee that new fields will be entirely represented by flags.
> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/vport-vxlan.c b/net/openvswitch/vport-vxlan.c
> index d7c46b3..dd68c97 100644
> --- a/net/openvswitch/vport-vxlan.c
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/vport-vxlan.c
> @@ -146,6 +147,7 @@ static int vxlan_tnl_send(struct vport *vport, struct
> sk_buff *skb)
> struct vxlan_port *vxlan_port = vxlan_vport(vport);
> __be16 dst_port = inet_sk(vxlan_port->vs->sock->sk)->inet_sport;
> struct ovs_key_ipv4_tunnel *tun_key;
> + struct vxlan_metadata md;
It might be a good idea to zero out 'md', even if not strictly required.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
