On 01/07/15 at 02:45pm, Jesse Gross wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Thomas Graf <tg...@suug.ch> wrote: > > A VXLAN net_device looking for an appropriate socket may only > > consider a socket which has the exact set of extensions enabled. > > If none can be found, a new socket must be created. > > Maybe it's just the phrasing of the commit message but won't the new > socket that needs to be created immediately fail? I think this is > really just checking that you don't try to instantiate two different > sets of extensions on the same UDP port - it's not like this is going > to somehow create a new socket and they will be able to coexist.
Your interpretation is correct and the phrasing is poor. It prevents a non-GBP socket from being used for a GBP socket. I will rework the commit message. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
