Hi, Thank you for everything its working fine now. Its able to send only report from the port, after enabling flood report command.
Thanks, Gandharva S On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Gandharva S Murthy <gandharva...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > Sorry it was mistake with the local system. Its working fine now. > > Thanks, > Gandharva > > On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Gandharva S Murthy < > gandharva...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> We tried to patch the email which you sent, RFC[1/2] went well and patch >> applied without any errors. But, RFC[2/2] patch has got some error it >> seems, it shows me failed to apply some patch on mcast-snooping.c. The log >> of patch is as shown below, >> >> patching file lib/mcast-snooping.c >> Hunk #3 FAILED at 597. >> 1 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file lib/mcast-snooping.c.rej >> patching file lib/mcast-snooping.h >> patching file ofproto/ofproto-dpif-xlate.c >> patching file ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c >> Hunk #1 succeeded at 3063 (offset -37 lines). >> patching file ofproto/ofproto-provider.h >> patching file ofproto/ofproto.c >> patching file ofproto/ofproto.h >> patching file utilities/ovs-vsctl.8.in >> patching file vswitchd/bridge.c >> patching file vswitchd/vswitch.xml >> >> I have also attached the original file, file after applying patch and the >> rejected patch set file. Can you please assist us with solving the issue. >> >> Thanks, >> Gandharva S >> >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 8:47 PM, Flavio Leitner <f...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 08:25:48PM +0530, Neethi Shashidhar wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > we have cloned the master branch,but the patch doesn't seem to be a >>> part of >>> > it and it works same as earlier. can you please explain how do we get >>> it >>> > using the list that you have sent. >>> >>> You have to get the patches from the e-mail and apply manually >>> on your cloned repo. See this documentation: >>> >>> http://git-scm.com/book/en/v2/Distributed-Git-Maintaining-a-Project#Applying-Patches-from-E-mail >>> >>> Thanks, >>> fbl >>> >>> > >>> > Thanks, >>> > Neethi >>> > On 12-Dec-2014 6:27 pm, "Flavio Leitner" <f...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:46:50PM +0530, Neethi Shashidhar wrote: >>> > > > Hi, >>> > > > >>> > > > we are unable to find the patch against the master branch.can you >>> tell us >>> > > > how to get it? >>> > > >>> > > I sent to the list with copies to everyone in the thread. >>> > > Here is the archive url: >>> > > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2014-December/049620.html >>> > > >>> > > fbl >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > Thanks, >>> > > > Neethi >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Aman Kumar <amank3...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Thanks Flavio, >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Tomorrow i will test it and once it will over i will inform you. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Thanks >>> > > > > Aman Kumar >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 9:49 PM, Aman Kumar <amank3...@gmail.com >>> > >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> > > > >> From: Flavio Leitner <f...@redhat.com> >>> > > > >> Date: Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:16 PM >>> > > > >> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] Support for MCAST_Snooping >>> > > > >> To: Aman Kumar <amank3...@gmail.com> >>> > > > >> Cc: gangadhar.si...@hp.com, Neethi Shashidhar < >>> neethi...@gmail.com>, >>> > > > >> Gandharva S Murthy <gandharva...@gmail.com>, "< >>> dev@openvswitch.org>" >>> > > < >>> > > > >> dev@openvswitch.org>, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 08:41:34AM +0530, Aman Kumar wrote: >>> > > > >> > Yes, Please do the patch against branch master and inform me, >>> i will >>> > > > >> test >>> > > > >> > it with branch master. >>> > > > >> > Currently i am using the branch master only. >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> OK, I've done the patches and sent them as a new thread: >>> > > > >> "[RFC 0/2] Add support to control Reports forwarding" >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> It's pretty much *compile tested only* because my lack of >>> > > > >> time for this, so please help me providing feedback. >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> This is RFC because I am not happy with the vlan handling. >>> > > > >> I think it should be per vlan, so instead of 'true'/'false', >>> > > > >> it could be a list of vlans or 'trunk'. >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> E.g.: >>> > > > >> for specific vlans: >>> > > > >> other_config:mcast-snooping-flood-reports="10,12,48" >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> or for all vlans: >>> > > > >> other_config:mcast-snooping-flood-reports="trunk" >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> to be decided yet... >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> Thanks, >>> > > > >> fbl >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > > >>> > > >>> >> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev