On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:49:33AM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:44:58AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > NMX selection method > > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <simon.hor...@netronome.com> > > I'm not sure that it makes sense to check the prerequisites. It's easy > to imagine wanting to use fields as part of the selection method when > they are present, and simply omitting them when they are not. TCP ports > are one obvious example (you probably still want to be able to pass > non-TCP flows through the group); the IPv6 flow id is another.
Thanks, that was not something that I had considered. I was thinking more of a scenario where matches and groups were closely tied. So the scenario you describe would involve different groups with different fields though possibly their buckets would be identical. In any case, I think your suggestion is reasonable depending on how other threads of discussion regarding fields pan out. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
