Dear Sirs,
I'm working on a project in which the goal is to add a new ofproto provider to
ovs while keeping ofproto_dpif. We use ovs version I created a new ofproto
_class (ofproto_new) and I register an instance of this new type of ofproto
class in ofproto_init() the same way as the existing ofproto_dpif_class:
void
ofproto_init(const struct shash *iface_hints)
{
struct shash_node *node;
size_t i;
ofproto_class_register(&ofproto_dpif_class);
ofproto_class_register(&ofproto_new_class);
...
}
In my implementation enumerate_types() of the new class returns only a single
type, let's call it "new". Similarly to ofproto_dpif implementation the passed
sset pointed by types will be cleared before adding the new member.
I observed that when bridge_run__() is invoked only the type_run() of
ofproto_new_class is invoked, type_run() of ofproto_dpif_class will never be
called. If my interpretation is correct then ofproto_enumerate_types() invoked
in bridge_run__() should go through the registered ofproto provider classes and
collect the "types".
void
ofproto_enumerate_types(struct sset *types)
{
size_t i;
sset_clear(types);
for (i = 0; i < n_ofproto_classes; i++) {
ofproto_classes[i]->enumerate_types(types);
}
}
But since the enumerate_types() functions (both of ofproto_dpif and similarly
ofproto_new) clear the passed sset only the types of the last ofproto_class
will be collected and provided to bridge_run__().
Maybe my interpretation is wrong but I guess the types retrieved by each call
of ->enumerate_types() in ofproto_enumerate_types() should be merged. Is there
any reason why this is not done in your ofproto_enumerate_types()
implementation?
Best Regards,
Zoltan Balogh
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
