On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Flavio Leitner <f...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:07:08PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 08:04:29PM -0200, Flavio Leitner wrote: >> > The above is not available in Fedora 20. >> > # stat /sys/module/openvswitch/version >> > stat: cannot stat ???/sys/module/openvswitch/version???: No such file or >> > directory >> > # uname -r >> > 3.16.7-200.fc20.x86_64 >> >> You only get it with the out-of-tree module (which is expected). > > Right, though I think the in-tree module could export the version > as well, so that we could track that too. For example: > > $ modinfo openvswitch | grep vermagic > vermagic: 3.16.7-200.fc20.x86_64... Will this always be the same as the OS version? I think the controller / user space may be more interested in OVS version,
For example, on my ubuntu system, I got the following output: versmagic: 3.13.0-19-generic SMP mod_unload modversions It is hard to decipher which OVS version was selected by the distribution, or contains modifications or back-ports by distribution in general. On the other hand, if this feature is useful for redhat distribution, and make sense within this scope, I don't see any harm in adding it in case OVS version is not directly obtainable. Make sense? What do you think? Andy > > Just a suggestion, no big deal for me. > fbl > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > dev@openvswitch.org > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
