On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 09:29:25AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > > On Oct 29, 2014, at 11:46 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > I have mixed feelings about this change. I think it might be better to > > change the classifier priority type to "int", then document that negative > > values are reserved for use by the classifier. > > > > I agree that using an ?int? would be cleaner. I think the only > current ?user? of negative values is the test-classifier, so there > should not be any fallout due to changing this. Do you want me to do > that?
I'd rather do it myself as a replacement for this patch; I thought about it but decided to write the current one as a kind of "poll" instead. (The following patch will need revision too, but it'll probably end up easier to understand.) _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
