On 10/24/14 at 01:43pm, Pravin Shelar wrote: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Kyle Mestery <mest...@mestery.com> wrote: > > Neutron uses those for the physical bridge mappings when using the OVS > > agent with the ML2 plugin [1] and VLANs. > > > > [1] > > http://docs.openstack.org/havana/install-guide/install/apt/content/network-node-install-plugin-openvswitch-agent.html > > > > Thanks for the link. > So here we are using the name in similar way, so Why should that cause > confusion?
I think you got the point, it's similar but not necessarily compatible which could be a source for confusion. How about we propose to use the "tun-eth1" for the bridge name? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
