On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 01:44:49PM +0530, Rishi Bamba wrote:
> I just need to mention and get a confirmation on the process we are following 
> for contribution to the OpenvSwitch i.e in line with contributing document of 
> the Dev forum.This is mainly how we are using GIT for the same. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     1. 
> Fork the repository from the main OVS official 
> repository(https://github.com/openvswitch/ovs). 
>     2. 
> Create a development branch in our forked repository. 
>     3. 
> Make changes and commit on the development branch of our forked repository. 
>     4. 
> Push the development branch to our forked repository. 
>     5. 
> Format-patch or diff from the master branch of our forked repository with 
> development branch of our forked repository. 
>     6. 
> Create the Patch. 

We only care about the patch that you post.  Otherwise, you may follow
any development process you find convenient.

> Query 2 : Do we need to synchronize the forked master branch with the
> official OVS repository , if yes how often ?

The patches you post should be based on the latest master.  It doesn't
matter to us how you do that.

> Query 3 : When do we merge the forked master branch with the forked
> development branch OR is it like the development branch is directly
> taken on finalizing the code via a pull request.

I don't understand that question.  The patches you post should be based
on the latest master.  It doesn't matter to us how you do that.

> Query 4 : If a patch that is already in review and the same is the
> basis of another patch that needs to be submitted later, do we have to
> wait for review completion of the first patch or we can submit another
> patch mentioning the details about previous patch i.e already under
> review.

It's best to post related patches together in one series.  If you can't
do that, make sure you tell us that a new patch depends on one currently
under review.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to