On Sep 14, 2014, at 7:34 PM, Samuel Ghinet <sghi...@cloudbasesolutions.com> wrote:
> This netdev check on windows, I understand, would translate to a km-um / > netlink communication by which it will be checked if the hyper-v switch does > have a port with friendly name X. > The only thing that remains is to be sure that when that vnic disconnects, a > vport delete will happen (I assume this is the expected behavior). When the vNIC (aka VIF) disconnects, it should disappear from the datapath but still show up in the DB. Now looks like the Windows version of netdev will be critical for the bootstrapping. We'll discuss it during the meeting or maybe earlier. Thanks, -- Nithin _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
