There would be one issue from me: there was an email - reply to a vport patch time ago, where hyper-v switch ports were separated from ovs / datapath ports. The discussion had remained pending, but it might be important if we plan netlink commands vport new and vport delete for the near future.
Sam ________________________________________ Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 18:10:14 +0000 From: Eitan Eliahu <elia...@vmware.com> To: "dev@openvswitch.org" <dev@openvswitch.org> Subject: [ovs-dev] OVS-on-HyperV: Agenda for IRC meeting on 9/10 Message-ID: <b7de5b01a6d04d069381b194b4419...@ex13-mbx-018.vmware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, here are some items we would like to follow up on. Please feel free to add anything you would like to discuss. Outstanding review status -------------------- [1] NET_BUFFER_LIST to NET_BUFFER (Sam, Alin) [2] Asynchronous Event user mode (Eitan) [3] dpif_linux.c (Alin) [4] Port Dump (Sam, Alin) Current tasks ------------------ [1] MC Group subscribe (Eitan) [2] Even Read (Eitan) [3] Making NL ATTR function inline (Ankur) Packet receive: ------------------ Packet receive functionality implementation can possibly go along with the Events implementation, but we'll wait till Eitan takes the first stab at the changes so we don't to re-invent the wheel. Assignment of next tasks: ------------------ [1] Packet execute [2] Flow Dump [3] Packet receive [4] Using NL ATTR put/get for already implemented commands. Thanks, Eitan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
