On Mon, Sep 01, 2014 at 04:59:22PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 10:11:57AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 09:51:59AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:26:14AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > > [snip] > > > > The proposal seems reasonable on its own but given that EXT-350 allows a > > > standardized way to add group configuration extension I am not sure it > > > makes sense to add a specialized way to do that. > > > > Thanks, as discussed off-line, on closer examination I see that our > > proposal could fit into EXT-350 as a group property. > > We have updated our proposal to use an EXT-350 group property. > The revised version is below. > > We have also started on an implementation of EXT-350. Our current plan is > to implement EXT-350 as an OpenFlow 1.5 group_mod message. Let me know if > you would like us to make it some kind of experimenter message instead.
This seems fine as a start. We can refine it as necessary when the prototype is available. You might consider at some point fitting this in the template for an OpenFlow extension in the of-extension directory of the ONF extensibility Git repo. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
