On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Pravin Shelar <pshe...@nicira.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Andy Zhou <az...@nicira.com> wrote:
>> Since kernel stack is limited in size, it is not wise to using
>> recursive function with large stack frames.
>>
>> This patch provides an alternative implementation of recirc action
>> without using recursion.
>>
>> A per CPU fixed sized, 'deferred action stack' is used to store both
>> recirc and sample actions when executing actions. These actions becomes
>> 'deferred actions".
>>
>> Deferred actions are only executed after all other actions has been
>> executed, including the ones triggered by loopback from the kernel
>> network stack.
>>
>> The depth of the private stack, currently set to 10, limits the number
>> of 'deferred actions' can be accumulated for each packet.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andy Zhou <az...@nicira.com>
>
> Patch looks good, I have few comments.
>
>> ---
>>  datapath/actions.c  | 150 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>>  datapath/actions.h  |   4 +-
>>  datapath/datapath.c |   4 +-
>>  3 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/datapath/actions.c b/datapath/actions.c
>> index 31fb57d..662de9c 100644
>> --- a/datapath/actions.c
>> +++ b/datapath/actions.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>>  #include "actions.h"
>>
>>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct ovs_action_stack, action_stacks);
>> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, ovs_exec_actions_count);
>>
> ....
>
> @@ -741,33 +758,39 @@ static int sample(struct datapath *dp, struct
> sk_buff *skb,
>>         rem = nla_len(acts_list);
>>         a = nla_data(acts_list);
>>
>> +       if (unlikely(rem == 0))
>> +               return 0;
>> +
>>         /* Actions list is either empty or only contains a single user-space
>>          * action, the latter being a special case as it is the only known
>>          * usage of the sample action.
>>          * In these special cases don't clone the skb as there are no
>>          * side-effects in the nested actions.
>>          * Otherwise, clone in case the nested actions have side effects. */
>> -       if (likely(rem == 0 ||
>> -                  (nla_type(a) == OVS_ACTION_ATTR_USERSPACE &&
>> -                   last_action(a, rem)))) {
>> -               sample_skb = skb;
>> -               skb_get(skb);
>> +       if (nla_type(a) == OVS_ACTION_ATTR_USERSPACE &&
>> +           last_action(a, rem)) {
>> +               return output_userspace(dp, skb, a);
> This is optimization, should be kept in separate patch.
>
>>         } else {
>> -               sample_skb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> -               if (!sample_skb)
>> -                       /* Skip the sample action when out of memory. */
>> +               struct ovs_deferred_action *da;
>> +
>> +               skb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> +               if (!skb)
>> +                       /* Out of memory, skip the sample action. */
>> +                       return 0;
>> +
>> +               da = push_actions(skb, a, rem);
>> +               if (!da) {
>> +                       if (net_ratelimit())
>> +                               pr_warn("%s: stack limit reached, drop 
>> sample action\n",
>> +                                       ovs_dp_name(dp));
>> +                       kfree_skb(skb);
>>                         return 0;
>> +               }
>>
>> -               flow_key_clone(skb, &sample_key);
>> +               flow_key_clone(skb, &da->pkt_key);
>>         }
>>
>> -       /* Note that do_execute_actions() never consumes skb.
>> -        * In the case where skb has been cloned above it is the clone that
>> -        * is consumed.  Otherwise the skb_get(skb) call prevents
>> -        * consumption by do_execute_actions(). Thus, it is safe to simply
>> -        * return the error code and let the caller (also
>> -        * do_execute_actions()) free skb on error. */
>> -       return do_execute_actions(dp, sample_skb, a, rem);
>> +       return 0;
>>  }
>>
>>  static void execute_hash(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nlattr *attr)
>> @@ -837,11 +860,10 @@ static int execute_set_action(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>         return err;
>>  }
>>
>> -
>>  static int execute_recirc(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>                           const struct nlattr *a, int rem)
>>  {
>> -       struct sw_flow_key recirc_key;
>> +       struct ovs_deferred_action *da;
>>
>>         if (!is_skb_flow_key_valid(skb)) {
>>                 int err;
>> @@ -854,26 +876,40 @@ static int execute_recirc(struct datapath *dp, struct 
>> sk_buff *skb,
>>         BUG_ON(!is_skb_flow_key_valid(skb));
>>
>>         if (!last_action(a, rem)) {
>> -               /* Recirc action is the not the last action
>> -                * of the action list. */
>> -               skb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> +               /* Recirc action is the not the last action,
>> +                * We will need to push skb clone instead of skb. */
>>
>> -               /* Skip the recirc action when out of memory, but
>> -                * continue on with the rest of the action list. */
>> +               skb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
>>                 if (!skb)
>> +                       /* Out of memory, skip recirc. */
>>                         return 0;
>>
>> -               flow_key_clone(skb, &recirc_key);
>> +               /* Push the skb clone for recirc. */
>> +               da = push_actions(skb, NULL, 0);
>> +               if (!da)
>> +                       goto stack_full;
>> +
>> +               flow_key_clone(skb, &da->pkt_key);
>> +       } else {
>> +               skb_get(skb);
> why do we need skb_get()?
>
>> +               if (!push_actions(skb, NULL, 0))
>> +                       goto stack_full;
>
>>         }
>>
>>         flow_key_set_recirc_id(skb, nla_get_u32(a));
>> -       ovs_dp_process_packet(skb);
>> +       return 0;
>> +
>> +stack_full:
>> +       if (net_ratelimit())
>> +               pr_warn("%s: stack limit reached, drop recirc action\n",
>> +                       ovs_dp_name(dp));
>> +
>>         return 0;
>>  }
>>
>>  /* Execute a list of actions against 'skb'. */
>> -static int do_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> -                       const struct nlattr *attr, int len)
>> +static void do_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> +                              const struct nlattr *attr, int len)
>>  {
> what is reason for changing function prototype?
Because the return value is not being used.  It is also not clear what
the return code means.
>
>>         /* Every output action needs a separate clone of 'skb', but the 
>> common
>>          * case is just a single output action, so that doing a clone and
>> @@ -920,7 +956,7 @@ static int do_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, 
>> struct sk_buff *skb,
>>                 case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_PUSH_VLAN:
>>                         err = push_vlan(skb, nla_data(a));
>>                         if (unlikely(err)) /* skb already freed. */
>> -                               return err;
>> +                               return;
>>                         break;
>>
>>                 case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_POP_VLAN:
>> @@ -929,12 +965,6 @@ static int do_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, 
>> struct sk_buff *skb,
>>
>>                 case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_RECIRC:
>>                         err = execute_recirc(dp, skb, a, rem);
>> -                       if (last_action(a, rem)) {
>> -                               /* If this is the last action, the skb has
>> -                                * been consumed or freed.
>> -                                * Return immediately. */
>> -                               return err;
>> -                       }
>>                         break;
>>
>>                 case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_SET:
>> @@ -948,7 +978,7 @@ static int do_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, 
>> struct sk_buff *skb,
>>
>>                 if (unlikely(err)) {
>>                         kfree_skb(skb);
>> -                       return err;
>> +                       return;
>>                 }
>>         }
>>
>> @@ -956,14 +986,50 @@ static int do_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, 
>> struct sk_buff *skb,
>>                 do_output(dp, skb, prev_port);
>>         else
>>                 consume_skb(skb);
>> +}
>>
>> -       return 0;
>> +static void ovs_process_deferred_packets(struct datapath *dp)
>> +{
>> +       struct ovs_action_stack *stack;
>> +
>> +       stack = this_cpu_ptr(&(action_stacks));
>> +
>> +       /* Finishing executing all deferred actions. */
>> +       while (!action_stack_is_empty(stack)) {
>> +               struct ovs_deferred_action *da = action_stack_pop(stack);
>> +               struct sk_buff *skb = da->skb;
>> +               const struct nlattr *actions = da->actions;
>> +               int rem = da->rem;
>> +
>> +               if (!actions) {
>> +                       struct sw_flow *flow = ovs_dp_packet_flow_lookup(dp, 
>> skb);
>> +
>> +                       if (flow) {
>> +                               struct sw_flow_actions *sf_acts;
>> +
>> +                               sf_acts = rcu_dereference(flow->sf_acts);
>> +                               actions = sf_acts->actions;
>> +                               rem = sf_acts->actions_len;
>> +                       }
>> +               }
>> +
>> +               if (actions)
>> +                       do_execute_actions(dp, skb, actions, rem);
>> +       }
>
> We also need limit on number of recirc actions executed for given packet.
>
>>  }
>>
>>  /* Execute a list of actions against 'skb'. */
>> -int ovs_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
>> sw_flow_actions *acts)
>> +void ovs_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> +                        struct sw_flow_actions *acts)
>>  {
>> -       return do_execute_actions(dp, skb, acts->actions, acts->actions_len);
>> +       this_cpu_inc(ovs_exec_actions_count);
>> +
>> +       do_execute_actions(dp, skb, acts->actions, acts->actions_len);
>> +
>> +       if (this_cpu_read(ovs_exec_actions_count) == 1)
>> +               ovs_process_deferred_packets(dp);
>> +
>> +       this_cpu_dec(ovs_exec_actions_count);
>>  }
>>
>>  void ovs_action_stacks_init(void)
>> diff --git a/datapath/actions.h b/datapath/actions.h
>> index 5f98ad4..84801fa 100644
>> --- a/datapath/actions.h
>> +++ b/datapath/actions.h
>> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
>>
>>  struct ovs_deferred_action {
>>         struct sk_buff *skb;
>> -       struct nlattr *actions;
>> +       const struct nlattr *actions;
>>         int rem;
>>
> This should be part of first patch.
>
>>         /* Store pkt_key clone during recirc */
>> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct ovs_action_stack {
>>
>>  void ovs_action_stacks_init(void);
>>  void ovs_action_stacks_exit(void);;
>> -int ovs_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
>> sw_flow_actions *acts);
>> +void ovs_execute_actions(struct datapath *dp, struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
>> sw_flow_actions *acts);
>>  void ovs_process_action_stack(void);
>>
>>  #endif /* actions.h */
>> diff --git a/datapath/datapath.c b/datapath/datapath.c
>> index 5bae23e..2424a62 100644
>> --- a/datapath/datapath.c
>> +++ b/datapath/datapath.c
>> @@ -595,12 +595,12 @@ static int ovs_packet_cmd_execute(struct sk_buff *skb, 
>> struct genl_info *info)
>>         sf_acts = rcu_dereference(flow->sf_acts);
>>
>>         local_bh_disable();
>> -       err = ovs_execute_actions(dp, packet, sf_acts);
>> +       ovs_execute_actions(dp, packet, sf_acts);
>>         local_bh_enable();
>>         rcu_read_unlock();
>>
>>         ovs_flow_free(flow, false);
>> -       return err;
>> +       return 0;
>>
>>  err_unlock:
>>         rcu_read_unlock();
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev mailing list
>> dev@openvswitch.org
>> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to