On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:42:13PM +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 08/14/14 at 09:22am, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > The real issue here is that you'd like to allow OFPACT_REG_MOVE to be > > part of an action set. That's fine. I have no objection. The only > > task is to decide where reg_move actions go in the ordering. Where do > > you want it? I get the impression that you'd like them mixed together > > with the "set" actions but maybe that's just because you've been trying > > to rationalize them as a form of "set" actions. > > OK. My preference would be mixed together with the "set" actions so > that a move followed by a load to the same register results in the > load properly overwriting the register. What is your preference? Are > you OK with including OFPACT_REG_MOVE unconditionally?
Yes, it's fine with me. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
