On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:21:49PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote: > Compiler implementations may provide sub-optimal support for a > memory_order passed in as a run-time value (ref. > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/_005f_005fatomic-Builtins.html). > > Document that OVS atomics require the memory order to be passed in as > a compile-time constant. > > It should be noted, however, that when inlining is disabled (i.e., > compiling without optimization) even compile-time constants may be > passed as run-time values to (non-inlined) functions. > > Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme <jrajaha...@nicira.com>
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
