Thx, pushed both patches to master and branch-2.3. I'll try improving the thread-safety of connmgr module later,
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Alex Wang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Andy Zhou <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Alex Wang <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Thx for the suggestion, I think it will make the connmgr module safer >> > if we annotate the ofproto->connmgr. With a quick look, I think it will >> > take more checking and efforts, (for functions we know that are only >> called >> > by the main thread, there is no lock protection) >> Is this safe if ofproto->connmgr can be accessed by other threads? >> > > > I think it is safe. since main thread creates/deletes the connmgr, > > > > >> > >> > For branch-2.3, I want to use this fix. Do you think it is okay? >> I suppose so, as long as the fix is safe. Your call. >> > > > Thx, will backport it soon, > > _______________________________________________ dev mailing list [email protected] http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
