With that change,
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>

On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 02:46:20PM +1200, Joe Stringer wrote:
> The handle_missed_revalidation() call is inverse from what I had intended:
> 
> diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
> index 9c2a8a4..70f9a43 100644
> --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
> +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
> @@ -1583,7 +1583,7 @@ revalidator_sweep__(struct revalidator *revalidator,
> bool purge)
>              if (purge
>                  || (missed_flow
>                      && revalidator->udpif->need_revalidate
> -                    && handle_missed_revalidation(revalidator, ukey))) {
> +                    && !handle_missed_revalidation(revalidator, ukey))) {
>                  struct dump_op *op = &ops[n_ops++];
> 
>                  dump_op_init(op, ukey->key, ukey->key_len, ukey);
> 
> 
> On 3 July 2014 12:29, Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com> wrote:
> 
> > If the datapath doesn't dump a flow for some reason, and the current
> > dump is expected to revalidate all flows in the datapath, then perform
> > revalidation for those flows by fetching them during the sweep phase.
> > If revalidation is not required, then leave the flow in the datapath and
> > don't revalidate it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Make the revalidator_sweep__() logic easier to read.
> >     Rebase.
> > RFC: First post.
> > ---
> >  ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c |   55
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
> > index 74d9686..9c2a8a4 100644
> > --- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
> > +++ b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif-upcall.c
> > @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
> >  VLOG_DEFINE_THIS_MODULE(ofproto_dpif_upcall);
> >
> >  COVERAGE_DEFINE(upcall_duplicate_flow);
> > +COVERAGE_DEFINE(revalidate_missed_dp_flow);
> >
> >  /* A thread that reads upcalls from dpif, forwards each upcall's packet,
> >   * and possibly sets up a kernel flow as a cache. */
> > @@ -1537,6 +1538,31 @@ revalidate(struct revalidator *revalidator)
> >      dpif_flow_dump_state_uninit(udpif->dpif, state);
> >  }
> >
> > +/* Called with exclusive access to 'revalidator' and 'ukey'. */
> > +static bool
> > +handle_missed_revalidation(struct revalidator *revalidator,
> > +                           struct udpif_key *ukey)
> > +    OVS_NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS
> > +{
> > +    struct udpif *udpif = revalidator->udpif;
> > +    struct nlattr *mask, *actions;
> > +    size_t mask_len, actions_len;
> > +    struct dpif_flow_stats stats;
> > +    struct ofpbuf *buf;
> > +    bool keep = false;
> > +
> > +    COVERAGE_INC(revalidate_missed_dp_flow);
> > +
> > +    if (!dpif_flow_get(udpif->dpif, ukey->key, ukey->key_len, &buf,
> > +                       &mask, &mask_len, &actions, &actions_len, &stats))
> > {
> > +        keep = revalidate_ukey(udpif, ukey, mask, mask_len, actions,
> > +                               actions_len, &stats);
> > +        ofpbuf_delete(buf);
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    return keep;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void
> >  revalidator_sweep__(struct revalidator *revalidator, bool purge)
> >      OVS_NO_THREAD_SAFETY_ANALYSIS
> > @@ -1550,21 +1576,24 @@ revalidator_sweep__(struct revalidator
> > *revalidator, bool purge)
> >      /* During garbage collection, this revalidator completely owns its
> > ukeys
> >       * map, and therefore doesn't need to do any locking. */
> >      HMAP_FOR_EACH_SAFE (ukey, next, hmap_node, revalidator->ukeys) {
> > -        if (!purge && ukey->mark) {
> > +        if (ukey->flow_exists) {
> > +            bool missed_flow = !ukey->mark;
> > +
> >              ukey->mark = false;
> > -        } else if (!ukey->flow_exists) {
> > -            ukey_delete(revalidator, ukey);
> > -        } else {
> > -            struct dump_op *op = &ops[n_ops++];
> > -
> > -            /* If we have previously seen a flow in the datapath, but
> > didn't
> > -             * see it during the most recent dump, delete it. This allows
> > us
> > -             * to clean up the ukey and keep the statistics consistent. */
> > -            dump_op_init(op, ukey->key, ukey->key_len, ukey);
> > -            if (n_ops == REVALIDATE_MAX_BATCH) {
> > -                push_dump_ops(revalidator, ops, n_ops);
> > -                n_ops = 0;
> > +            if (purge
> > +                || (missed_flow
> > +                    && revalidator->udpif->need_revalidate
> > +                    && handle_missed_revalidation(revalidator, ukey))) {
> > +                struct dump_op *op = &ops[n_ops++];
> > +
> > +                dump_op_init(op, ukey->key, ukey->key_len, ukey);
> > +                if (n_ops == REVALIDATE_MAX_BATCH) {
> > +                    push_dump_ops(revalidator, ops, n_ops);
> > +                    n_ops = 0;
> > +                }
> >              }
> > +        } else {
> > +            ukey_delete(revalidator, ukey);
> >          }
> >      }
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.10.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dev mailing list
> > dev@openvswitch.org
> > http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
> >
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev@openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to