Acked-by: Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com>

On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote:

> I thought this was in here already, but I guess not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com>
> ---
>  CodingStyle |    5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/CodingStyle b/CodingStyle
> index 0ba0366..628f21f 100644
> --- a/CodingStyle
> +++ b/CodingStyle
> @@ -162,6 +162,11 @@ such a function (including the C standard library
> function free())
>  should omit a null-pointer check.  We find that this usually makes
>  code easier to read.
>
> +Functions in .c files should not normally be marked "inline", because
> +it does not usually help code generation and it does suppress
> +compilers warnings about unused functions.  (Functions defined in .h
> +usually should be marked inline.)
> +
>
>  FUNCTION PROTOTYPES
>
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
> _______________________________________________
> dev mailing list
> dev@openvswitch.org
> http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to