> > > Thanks Ryan! > > I folded in this change to ensure that the caller could specify any > 'max_flows' that it likes. It doesn't make sense for the caller to > have to be aware of the implementation's limitations: > > I was debating between either using an assert or using the min of max_flows and FLOW_DUMP_MAX_BATCH as well. In the end, I think you're right; the caller should not be limited by the underlying implementation. Thanks for fixing this!
I also folded in the following to minimize the size of the overall > change (when ignoring whitespace changes): > > Thanks for fixing this as well! Ryan _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
