Please stay on the mailing list. I'm not doing substantive review of the patch, so I don't need a new repost. It is possible that whoever does review the patch could request one.
It is customary to describe the changes from one version of a patch to another following the commit message, near the diffstat. On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:04:19PM +0000, Polehn, Mike A wrote: > Hi Ben! > > This was a repost with no code changes but an additional performance change > comment. > > Do you want a new repost? > > Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ben Pfaff [mailto:b...@nicira.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 8:50 AM > To: Polehn, Mike A > Cc: dev@openvswitch.org > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] PATCH [1/1] High speed PMD physical NIC queue size, > resubmit > > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:58:26PM +0000, Polehn, Mike A wrote: > > Large TX and RX queues are needed for high speed 10 GbE physical NICS. > > Observed a 250% zero loss improvement over small NIC queue test for A > > port to port flow test. > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike A. Polehn <mike.a.pol...@intel.com> > > Please be more careful with subject lines. The correct format would be: > > [PATCH v2] High speed PMD physical NIC queue size > > or if you didn't actually change anything from the first posting (in which > case I'd discourage reposting it): > > [PATCH repost] High speed PMD physical NIC queue size > > The reason that this is important is because "git am" automatically strips > anything in brackets in the subject from the commit message. We don't want > PATCH or "resubmit" in the commit message. _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
