On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 04:51:20PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote: > I didn't like much the OVS_FORCE change, but indeed it's cheaper > than calling ntohl() and I don't have a better suggestion.
We use OVS_FORCE for hashing big-endian data elsewhere, so it's somewhat idiomatic in the OVS code base. (If you do come up with something better, let's fix it everywhere.) > Ok, I will respin the series with your fixes included and post v4. Thanks! _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
