On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 10:04:30PM -0700, Alex Wang wrote: > This commit adds logic that marks the 'struct iface's when their > status need to be updated but the current status update transaction > fails. So, the main thread can re-try the update in the next run. > > Bug #1256577 > > Signed-off-by: Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com>
Now that I see it here, I am not a fan of putting all of the ifaces on a list. It seems error-prone. I do not think that database transactions should fail often, and so I would prefer to just run the database refreshes on every port if the transaction fails. Does that work OK? _______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
