On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Simon Horman <ho...@verge.net.au> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 05:21:45PM +0100, Thomas Graf wrote:
>> On 06/02/14 at 01:43pm, Simon Horman wrote:
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_NET_MPLS_GSO
>> > +static netdev_features_t net_mpls_features(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> > + struct net_device *dev,
>> > + netdev_features_t features)
>> > +{
>> > + /* There is no support for MPLS LRO. So the only way that
>> > + * an MPLS skb could require GSO segmentation is if it
>> > + * was received as a non-MPLS skb and then became an MPLS skb.
>> > + * This may be effected by Open vSwitch in which case the
>> > + * mac_len will non-zero and not equal to skb_network_offset
>> > + * as the former indicates the end of L2 while the latter indicates
>> > + * the beginning of L3 and there is a gap between them occupied
>> > + * by the MPLS label stack.
>> > + *
>> > + * Thus it is possible to avoid traversing any VLAN tags that are
>> > + * present to determine if the ethtype is MPLS. Instead the
>> > + * inequality of mac_len and skb_network_offset are used to
>> > + * determine if a packet is MPLS for the purpose of determining
>> > + * offload features.
>> > + */
>> > + if (skb->mac_len && skb->mac_len != skb_network_offset(skb))
>> > + features &= dev->mpls_features;
>> > + return features;
>> > +}
>>
>> Could you elaborate a bit on the safety of this? What about
>> GRE GSO which sets mac_len to the inner network offset?
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> thanks for pointing that out.
>
> It seems to me that I made an error in extending an assumption
> that is true inside the (unmerged MPLS patch for) the Open vSwitch
> datapath to code outside of the datapath. I had thought this
> would be safe as the check should only trigger for packets
> manipulated by the datapath.
>
> I now think that its possible that the GRE GSO code could kick in: if the
> datapath outputs to GRE. And even if that is not the case it seems to me
> that adding an assumption in code in net/core/dev.c to the way mac_len is
> set which has not been universally adopted throughout net/ is asking for
> trouble.
>
> My _untested_ alternate approach as illustrated below is to check the
> ethernet type for MPLS, using skb_network_protocol to account for TEB and
> VLANs.
>
> I am slightly concerned about the performance implications of this
> approach. I notice harmonize_features() already makes a call to
> skb_network_protocol(). So if performance is a problem perhaps that call
> could be leveraged somehow.
To be honest, I think this actually really belongs as part of
netif_skb_features()/harmonize_features(). The point of those
functions is to return the offloading features that are available for
a given packet, so it's not clear why they wouldn't take MPLS into
account. If we merged them then it would both be cleaner and should
avoid any performance issues.
_______________________________________________
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
