Ahuh! Yes, I was running distcleancheck separately. I suppose that would explain it. I'll take a look at your patch.
On 29 May 2014 05:37, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > I tried running "make distcheck", which includes a call to > distcleancheck, and only found one problem. I sent out a patch: > http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2014-May/040737.html > > I don't know why you would get different results. Are you running > distcleancheck separately from distcheck? I've never tried that. > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 05:34:28PM +1200, Joe Stringer wrote: > > Right, I didn't see that before. > > > > So I'm a bit confused why the distcleancheck target is complaining about > > these files. Are the ovsidl test files added to OVSIDL_BUILT after it is > > added to EXTRA_DIST? > > > > I see it complaining about lib/socket-util-unix.{lo,o} now, too. > > > > > > On 28 May 2014 03:11, Ben Pfaff <b...@nicira.com> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 01:46:59PM +1200, Joe Stringer wrote: > > > > This was causing failures in 'make distcleancheck'. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joestrin...@nicira.com> > > > > > > OVSIDL_BUILT is already in EXTRA_DIST. It doesn't make sense to have > > > files be both distributed and distcleaned. > > > >
_______________________________________________ dev mailing list dev@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
